How to turn a job description into competencies
A practical guide to turning a job description into a short competency profile: the standard sections of a job description card, a five-step method, a worked example and common mistakes.
- Written by
- TeamCheck Editorial Team
- Published
- Updated
- Reading time
- 10 min read
- Change language
- العربية
Key takeaways
- A competency-based job description keeps the task detail and adds the knowledge, skills and behaviors needed to perform the role well.
- Grouping tasks into five to eight responsibilities, then asking what each one requires, is a practical route from tasks to competencies.
- Each competency needs a required level and two or three observable indicators, validated with the manager and people who do the job.
- Using one competency profile for hiring, assessment and 360 feedback keeps the standard consistent across the employee lifecycle.
A competency-based job description lists not only what a role does but also the knowledge, skills and behaviors a person needs to do it well. To create one, you start from the tasks in an existing job description, group them into the role's main responsibilities, and translate each responsibility into a small number of competencies with observable indicators and a required level.
The result is a short competency profile, usually five to eight competencies, that you can use to design assessments, write interview questions and run 360 feedback against the same standard. This guide covers the standard sections of a job description card, a five-step method for turning tasks into competencies, a worked example for one hypothetical role, and the mistakes that make job descriptions hard to use.
What is a job description, and what makes it competency-based?
A job description is a written summary of a role: why it exists, where it sits in the organization, what the person is responsible for and what they need to bring. It serves several audiences at once. Candidates use it to decide whether to apply. Managers use it to set expectations. HR uses it for grading, workforce planning, learning and performance management.
A traditional job description focuses on the work: tasks, responsibilities and conditions. A competency-based job description adds the worker requirements: the knowledge, skills and behaviors that predict good performance in that work. The distinction mirrors a long-standing discussion in the research. Sanchez and Levine (2009) compared traditional job analysis, which describes the work in detail, with competency modeling, which focuses on the behaviors an organization wants to encourage, and argued that each benefits from the strengths of the other. A good competency-based job description does exactly that: it keeps the task detail and adds a clear statement of what good performance requires.
Public occupational models make this split visible. The ONET Content Model, maintained for the U.S. Department of Labor, separates occupational requirements, such as work activities, from worker requirements, such as skills and knowledge, and worker characteristics, such as abilities and work styles. You can borrow that logic even if you never use ONET data.
The job description card: standard sections
In Saudi Arabia, many organizations use a structured job description card, a one- or two-page template with fixed sections. The exact layout varies, but the sections below are common practice.
| Section | What it contains | Why it matters for competencies |
|---|---|---|
| Job identification | Job title, job code, grade, department, location | Links the role to the organizational structure and, where used, to a standard occupation classification |
| Reporting lines | Who the role reports to, and who reports to it | Shows whether people leadership competencies are needed |
| Job purpose | One or two sentences on why the role exists | Anchors every competency to a business outcome |
| Key responsibilities | Five to eight main areas of accountability, each with its tasks | The main input for deriving competencies |
| Key performance indicators | How success in the role is measured | Helps set the required proficiency level |
| Working relationships | Main internal and external contacts | Points to communication and stakeholder competencies |
| Qualifications and experience | Education, certifications, years and type of experience | Minimum entry requirements; not a substitute for competencies |
| Competencies | Technical and behavioral competencies with required levels | The profile used in hiring, assessment and development |
| Working conditions | Schedule, travel, physical demands, work environment | Clarifies any role-specific requirements |
For the job identification section, the General Authority for Statistics (GASTAT) publishes the Saudi Unified Classification of Occupations, which organizations can use as a reference when aligning job titles with standard occupations. Check which classification and codes apply to your organization and its systems.
Qualifications are not competencies
A common gap is a card that lists qualifications and years of experience but no competencies. Qualifications show that someone has studied or worked in a field. They do not show whether the person can, for example, resolve an escalated customer complaint or build an accurate forecast. Competencies describe that capability directly, which is why they are more useful for selection and development.
From tasks to competencies in 5 steps
The method below works for most roles. It takes a few hours for one role when the manager and an HR partner work on it together.
- Collect and clean the task list. Start from the current job description, then check it with the manager and, ideally, one or two people doing the job. Remove tasks no longer performed and add those missing. Write each task as a verb plus an object, for example "prepare the weekly service-level report".
- Group tasks into key responsibilities. Cluster related tasks into five to eight responsibilities, such as "manage team performance" or "handle escalated cases". Each responsibility should describe an outcome, not a list of activities.
- Ask what each responsibility requires. For each responsibility, ask: what does someone need to know, to be able to do, and how do they need to behave to deliver this well? Separate the answers into technical competencies (knowledge and skills specific to the role) and behavioral competencies (ways of working, such as planning, communication or coaching). Where you have a competency framework, map the answers to its competencies instead of inventing new ones.
- Prioritize and set the required level. Keep the competencies that are critical, differentiate strong from average performance and are needed from day one. Five to eight is usually enough. For each, set the required level using your framework's proficiency scale, and write two or three behavioral indicators that describe what that level looks like in this role.
- Validate with the manager and job holders. Review the profile with the manager and people who do the job well. Ask whether a person who met every indicator would succeed, and whether anything critical is missing. Then record the profile in the job description card and agree when it will be reviewed.
Campion and colleagues (2011), in a widely cited review of best practices in competency modeling, recommend linking competency models to organizational goals, describing competencies in behavioral terms and defining how they change across levels. Steps 3 and 4 above apply those practices at the level of a single role.
Writing good behavioral indicators
- One behavior per indicator. "Plans and communicates priorities" is two indicators. Split it.
- Observable. "Explains the reason for a decision to the team" can be seen; "is a good leader" cannot.
- Role-specific. "Resolves escalated complaints within the agreed response time" is more useful than "provides good service".
- Level-appropriate. An indicator for a team leader should reflect team leader responsibilities, not those of a senior manager.
Worked example: one role mapped to competencies
The example below is hypothetical. It shows how a customer service team leader role in a retail company might move from tasks to a competency profile. Adapt the content to your context and framework.
Job purpose: Lead a team of customer service advisors to resolve customer requests accurately and on time, and to improve the customer experience.
| Key responsibility | Sample tasks | Competency | Type | Required level | Example behavioral indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manage daily service operations | Allocate cases, monitor queues, adjust schedules during peaks | Planning and organizing | Behavioral | Proficient | Rebalances workload when queue times exceed the agreed target |
| Handle escalated cases | Resolve complex complaints, approve exceptions within policy | Customer problem-solving | Technical | Advanced | Identifies the root cause of a complaint and agrees a resolution the customer accepts |
| Lead and develop the team | Run one-to-ones, give feedback, coach new advisors | Coaching and developing others | Behavioral | Proficient | Gives specific feedback on recorded calls within the same week |
| Report on performance | Prepare weekly service-level reports, explain trends to management | Data analysis and reporting | Technical | Proficient | Builds a weekly report from the case system and explains variances in plain language |
| Apply policies and procedures | Ensure compliance with service, refund and data policies | Policy and process knowledge | Technical | Advanced | Applies the refund policy correctly to non-standard cases and explains the reason to the customer |
| Work across departments | Coordinate with logistics and finance on open cases | Collaboration and influence | Behavioral | Proficient | Agrees deadlines with other teams and follows up before they are missed |
Notice three things about this profile. Each competency links back to a responsibility, so nothing is included "just in case". Technical and behavioral competencies are balanced, reflecting that the role is both hands-on and supervisory. And each indicator describes something a manager, interviewer or assessor could observe.
Using the competency profile in hiring, assessment and 360 feedback
A competency profile is useful only when it drives decisions. The same profile can support the whole employee lifecycle, which keeps standards consistent.
Hiring
Use the profile to decide what to measure and how. Technical competencies, such as data analysis or policy knowledge, are often best measured with job-relevant tests or work samples. Behavioral competencies, such as coaching or collaboration, are often best explored in a structured interview with questions written in advance and a scoring guide for each competency. An interview scorecard for structured interviews helps every interviewer rate candidates against the same indicators. Starting from competencies rather than qualifications alone is also the core idea of skills-based hiring.
Assessment and development
For current employees, the profile becomes the standard for assessing development needs. Comparing a person's measured level with the required level for each competency shows where to focus training, coaching or stretch assignments, and gives individual development plans a clear target.
360 feedback
Behavioral indicators can also become 360 feedback items, so that managers, peers and direct reports rate the same behaviors the role requires. Keep the wording consistent across the job description, the interview guide and the 360 questionnaire, so employees see one standard rather than three.
Doing it with TeamCheck
TeamCheck's technical assessments can generate competencies from a job description, and offer ready templates, a custom builder and competency-based tests to measure them. For development, TeamCheck's 360-Degree Feedback lets you upload a job description to generate the competencies for a 360 questionnaire.
Common job description mistakes
- Copying an old or generic template. A description written years ago, or borrowed from another organization, rarely matches the role as it is done today. Review tasks with the current manager.
- Listing tasks without a purpose. Without a clear purpose, it is hard to tell which tasks matter most and which competencies to prioritize.
- Too many competencies. A profile with fifteen or more competencies is hard to assess and dilutes attention. Keep the five to eight that matter most.
- Vague competency names. "Communication" alone means different things to different managers. Add a definition and behavioral indicators for the required level.
- Inflated requirements. Asking for qualifications or years of experience the role does not need can narrow the candidate pool without improving quality.
- No required level. A competency without a level cannot guide hiring decisions or development plans.
- Never reviewing it. Roles change with new systems, structures and priorities. Agree a review point, for example annually or when the role changes significantly.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a job description and a competency profile?
A job description explains the role: its purpose, reporting lines, responsibilities, conditions and requirements. A competency profile is the part that describes the knowledge, skills and behaviors needed to perform the role well, with required levels and indicators. In a competency-based job description, the profile sits inside the job description card, so both are maintained together.
How many competencies should a job description include?
Five to eight competencies is a practical range for most roles. That is enough to cover the main technical and behavioral requirements, and few enough to assess reliably in hiring and development. If you find more, check whether some overlap, or whether they describe tasks rather than capabilities, and combine or remove them.
Who should write the job description?
The line manager usually owns the content because they know the role best, with an HR partner guiding the structure, wording and competency mapping. Involving one or two people who currently do the job well helps confirm that the tasks and indicators are realistic. HR then checks consistency with the competency framework and grading structure.
Can AI generate competencies from a job description?
Yes, some tools can suggest competencies from a job description's text, which saves time on the first draft. Treat the output as a starting point. A manager and HR partner should still review each suggested competency, confirm it reflects the real role, set the required level and remove anything generic.
How often should job descriptions be updated?
Many organizations review job descriptions annually and whenever a role changes significantly, such as after a restructure, a new system or a change in scope. A review before each new hiring round is also good practice, so that assessments and interview questions reflect the role as it is today.
Summary
A job description becomes far more useful when it moves from a list of tasks to a short competency profile. Start from a clean task list, group it into responsibilities, translate each responsibility into technical and behavioral competencies with required levels and observable indicators, and validate the result with the people who know the role. Then use the same profile for hiring, assessment and 360 feedback, so everyone works to one standard. To turn a job description into competency-based tests, explore TeamCheck's technical assessments.
References
We cite sources so you can read further. Links open external websites.
- Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling (Campion, Fink, Ruggeberg, Carr, Phillips & Odman). Personnel Psychology, 2011. doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x (opens in a new tab)
- What is (or should be) the difference between competency modeling and traditional job analysis? (Sanchez & Levine). Human Resource Management Review, 2009. doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.10.002 (opens in a new tab)
- The O*NET Content Model. O*NET Resource Center, U.S. Department of Labor, 2026. www.onetcenter.org/content.html (opens in a new tab)
- The Guiding Manual for the Saudi Unified Classification of Occupations. General Authority for Statistics (GASTAT), 2025. stats.gov.sa/documents/d/guest/the-guiding-manual-for-the-saudi-unified-classification-of-occupations-en-2-pdf (opens in a new tab)
Written by
TeamCheck Editorial Team
TeamCheck is an HR talent intelligence platform. Articles are researched and written by the TeamCheck editorial team.