360-Degree Feedback
See performance from every perspective.
TeamCheck 360-Degree Feedback brings together structured feedback from managers, peers, direct reports and other relevant stakeholders, so development and performance conversations start from a complete picture.
Manager 1 · Peers 5 · Direct reports 6
Hidden strengthDeveloping others
Blind spotDecision-making
Built for
- HR business partners
- Learning and development
- People managers
- Leadership teams
In short
What is 360-degree feedback?
360-degree feedback, also called multi-rater feedback, is a structured process in which a person receives confidential feedback on their work behaviors from several perspectives, typically their manager, peers and direct reports, alongside their own self-assessment. Comparing these views reveals strengths, blind spots and priorities for development.
- Several perspectives
- Behavior, not personality
- Built for development
The problem
Annual reviews see one angle. Performance has many.
When feedback comes from one person once a year, it reflects one relationship and one memory. People get surprises instead of insight, and development plans rest on thin evidence.
A single viewpoint
A manager sees part of someone's work. Peers and direct reports see the rest.
Recency and memory
Without structure, reviews over-weight the last few weeks and the most visible moments.
Feedback without direction
General comments are hard to act on. Specific, behavioral feedback is not.
Who gives feedback
Every perspective sees something different.
Self
Your own view, as a reference point
Manager
Expectations, priorities and results
Peers
Collaboration and day-to-day work
Direct reports
Leadership, support and clarity
Stakeholders
Service and partnership, where relevant
Reading the gaps
Where self-perception and others' views meet, and where they don't.
Comparing self-ratings with others' ratings sorts each competency into one of four zones. Each zone calls for a different conversation.
Hidden strength
Others rate you higher than you do. Recognize it.
Shared strength
Rated highly by you and others. Build on it.
Development area
Rated lower by you and others. Prioritize it.
Blind spot
You rate yourself higher than others do. Explore it.
Competencies
Start from a template, your job description or your own framework.
Every 360 is built on competencies. Choose how you set them, then run the cycle and read the results.
- 1
Ready templates
Use a ready template for almost any position.
- 2
Generated from a job description
Adding a specific position? Upload the job description and TeamCheck generates the competencies.
- 3
Your own competencies
We map your organization's own competency framework into the platform.
36
competencies in the library
- Communication
- Decision-making
- Developing others
- Collaboration
- Customer focus
- Accountability
What you get
Analysis
Self and others compared, competency by competency, with gaps highlighted.
Management report
A summary for managers and HR across participants and teams.
Individual feedback report
A clear, personal report each participant can act on.
What you can do
Structured feedback people can act on.
Ready templates
Launch a cycle with ready templates for almost all positions.
Competencies from your job description
Upload a job description for a specific position and the system generates the competencies.
A library of 36 competencies
Pick from the competency library, or have us map your own framework.
Multiple rater groups
Collect perspectives from managers, peers, direct reports and other stakeholders where relevant.
Self versus others
Compare self-ratings with others' ratings to surface blind spots and hidden strengths.
Confidentiality you can explain
Report feedback by rater group, so raters can be candid and participants know how it works.
Management and individual reports
A management report for HR and leaders, and an individual feedback report for each participant.
| Participant | Communication | Decision-making | Developing others | Collaboration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANoor A. | 4.3 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| MSMajed S. | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.9 |
| LKLeen K. | 4.5 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| SRSaad R. | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.7 |
| Team average | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 4.2 |
Patterns across a team, at a glance.
The management report shows others' average rating for each participant and competency, so HR and leaders can spot shared strengths and development themes.
Illustrative management report with sample data.
How it works
How a 360° cycle runs.
- 1
Set the purpose
Decide whether the cycle is for development, evaluation or both, and communicate it clearly.
- 2
Choose raters
Agree on a balanced group of raters with each participant and their manager.
- 3
Collect feedback
Raters answer behavioral questions and add comments within a set window.
- 4
Discuss and plan
Review the report in a supportive conversation and agree on development priorities.
Development or evaluation
Decide what your 360° is for before you launch it.
The same process works very differently depending on how results are used.
| Developmental 360° | Evaluative 360° | |
|---|---|---|
| Main purpose | Growth and self-awareness | One input to performance or reward decisions |
| Who sees results | Usually the participant and a coach or manager | Also the people making the decision |
| Rater candor | Often higher, because the stakes are lower | Can be affected by higher stakes |
| Good starting point | Yes, especially when 360° feedback is new | Better once trust in the process is established |
Many organizations start with development and add evaluative uses later, if at all.
Use cases
Where 360° feedback makes a difference.
Leadership development
Grow leaders with evidence
Show leaders how their behavior is experienced by the people around them.
Performance conversations
Bring more than one view
Give managers structured, multi-source input before performance discussions.
Talent programs
Develop future leaders
Combine 360° feedback with psychometric insight to tailor development.
Team effectiveness
Improve how teams work
Spot shared development themes across a team or leadership group.
Buying considerations
What to look for in 360° feedback software.
A good 360° process depends as much on design and trust as on technology. Ask about both.
Ask us these questions in your demoConfidentiality
How are rater responses protected, and how are small rater groups handled?
Question quality
Are items behavioral, specific and relevant to your competencies?
Rater selection
Can participants and managers agree on a balanced set of raters?
Reports
Do reports make gaps and themes clear without overwhelming people?
Support for debriefs
Is there guidance for the people who discuss results with participants?
Language and culture
Can raters respond in the language they know best, with wording that suits your culture?
Further reading
Guides on 360° feedback.
Related solutions
Complete the picture.
- PsychometricAssessmentsPersonality, reasoning, EQ, potential and leadership.Explore Psychometric Assessments
- EmployeeExperience18 employee surveys, and the tools to act on them.Explore Employee Experience
- TechnicalAssessmentsVerify job-relevant skills, for hiring and development.Explore Technical Assessments
FAQ
360° feedback questions, answered.
What is the purpose of 360-degree feedback?
The main purpose is to help people understand how their work behaviors are experienced by others, so they can build on strengths and focus their development. Some organizations also use 360° results as one input to performance decisions.
How are competencies set up for a TeamCheck 360?
You can start from ready templates that cover almost all positions, pick from a library of 36 competencies, or upload a job description for a specific position and let the system generate the competencies. If your organization has its own competency framework, we map it into the platform.
Who should give feedback in a 360° review?
Typically the person's manager, several peers and, for people managers, their direct reports. Other stakeholders, such as internal clients, can add value where they see the person's work regularly.
How many raters are needed for a 360° review?
Enough for a balanced view and to protect confidentiality. A common practice is to require a minimum number of raters in a group, often three or more, before that group's results are shown separately.
Should 360° feedback be anonymous?
Rater feedback is usually confidential, reported by group rather than by individual, so people can be candid. The manager's feedback is often shown separately, because there is only one manager.
Does 360° feedback work in organizations new to upward feedback?
It can, with care. Starting with a development-focused cycle, explaining confidentiality clearly and having senior leaders take part first all help build trust in the process.
How often should 360° reviews take place?
Many organizations run 360° feedback once a year or less often, which gives people time to act on their development goals before the next cycle.
Know your leaders.
See how TeamCheck 360-Degree Feedback helps people see their impact clearly and grow with focus.