Competency framework: types, examples and how to build one
A practical guide to competency frameworks for HR leaders: core, behavioral, technical and leadership competencies, illustrative examples by level, a 7-step build method and how to use it.
- Written by
- TeamCheck Editorial Team
- Published
- Updated
- Reading time
- 10 min read
- Change language
- العربية
Key takeaways
- A competency framework defines the knowledge, skills and behaviors each role needs, described at clear levels of proficiency.
- Most frameworks combine core, behavioral, technical and leadership competencies, with five to eight competencies in each role profile.
- Behavioral indicators should describe actions someone could observe, so managers and raters read them the same way.
- A framework creates value only when the same definitions are used in hiring, 360 feedback, reviews and development.
A competency framework is a structured set of the knowledge, skills, abilities and behaviors an organization expects people to show in their roles, each one defined and described at different levels of proficiency. It gives hiring, performance reviews, 360 feedback and development one shared language for what good work looks like. A useful framework is short, specific to your organization and written in observable behavior.
This guide explains the main types of competencies, shows illustrative examples by job level, walks through a seven-step method for building a framework, and covers how to use one framework across hiring, feedback and development without it becoming a document nobody opens.
What is a competency framework?
A competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors and other characteristics that a person needs to perform a role well. The US Office of Personnel Management describes competencies as specifying the "how" of performing job tasks, not only the tasks themselves. A competency framework (often called a competency model) groups these competencies, defines each one and describes what it looks like at different levels.
Most frameworks have four parts:
- Competency name. A short label, such as "Planning and organizing".
- Definition. One or two sentences that explain what the competency covers and what it does not.
- Proficiency levels. Usually three to five levels, from foundational to expert or strategic.
- Behavioral indicators. Observable actions that show the competency at each level, such as "Breaks a project into milestones and tracks progress against them".
Competency framework vs job description
A job description lists the tasks and responsibilities of one role. A competency framework describes the behaviors and capabilities that lead to success across many roles. The two work together: the job description says what a person does, and the competency profile for that role says how they need to do it and at what level. If you are starting from existing job descriptions, the guide on turning a job description into competencies covers that step in detail.
Why organizations build one
Research on competency modeling, including the best-practice review by Campion and colleagues (2011), highlights a few reasons organizations use frameworks rather than role-by-role task lists:
- Alignment. Competencies can be linked to the organization's strategy and values, so people see which behaviors matter.
- Consistency. The same definitions apply in hiring, reviews and development, which makes decisions easier to explain.
- Differentiation. A good framework describes what distinguishes strong performance, not only the minimum.
- Development paths. Proficiency levels show people what the next level looks like.
Types of competencies: core, behavioral, technical and leadership
Most frameworks combine several types of competency. The labels vary between organizations, but the distinctions below are common.
| Type | What it covers | Who it applies to | Illustrative example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | Behaviors linked to the organization's values that everyone is expected to show | All employees | "Acts with integrity" |
| Behavioral | Interpersonal and personal ways of working that transfer across roles | Most roles, with emphasis varying by job | "Communicates clearly", "Works collaboratively" |
| Technical (functional) | Job-specific knowledge and skills | A job family or function | "Financial reporting", "Network security" |
| Leadership | Behaviors needed to lead people, teams and change | Managers and leaders, sometimes all levels | "Develops others", "Sets direction" |
Core competencies
Core competencies express what the organization stands for. They are usually few, often three to five, and they apply to every role. Keep them behavioral: "respect" is a value, while "listens to different views before deciding" is a behavior a colleague can observe.
Behavioral competencies
Behavioral competencies describe how people work with others and manage themselves: communication, teamwork, problem solving, adaptability and planning. Bartram's (2005) "Great Eight" model is a research-based example of how these can be grouped into broad areas, such as leading and deciding, supporting and cooperating, and organizing and executing. You do not need to adopt a published model, but checking your draft against one helps you spot gaps.
Technical competencies
Technical or functional competencies cover the knowledge and skills a specific job family needs, such as accounting standards, software engineering practices or procurement regulations. They change faster than behavioral competencies, so review them more often. They are also easier to test directly, for example with job-relevant skills tests.
Leadership competencies
Leadership competencies describe what effective leadership looks like at your organization: setting direction, developing people, leading change and making decisions. Many organizations describe them at several levels, from leading yourself to leading teams to leading the organization. For ways to measure them, see the guide to leadership assessment.
Competency framework examples by job level
The examples below are illustrative, not a validated framework. They show how the same competency changes as responsibility grows. Use them as a starting point for discussion with people who know the roles.
Example: "Planning and organizing"
| Level | Typical roles | Behavioral indicators (illustrative) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Foundational | Entry-level and individual contributors | Plans their own tasks for the week; meets agreed deadlines; flags early when a deadline is at risk |
| 2. Proficient | Experienced specialists, team leads | Breaks projects into milestones; balances competing priorities across a small team; adjusts plans when inputs change |
| 3. Advanced | Managers | Plans resources across several projects; anticipates dependencies between teams; sets realistic timelines with stakeholders |
| 4. Strategic | Senior leaders | Links annual plans to strategy; decides which initiatives to stop; builds planning capability in the management team |
Example: "Communicating clearly"
| Level | Behavioral indicators (illustrative) |
|---|---|
| 1. Foundational | Shares updates in time for others to use them; asks questions when instructions are unclear |
| 2. Proficient | Adapts the message to the audience; summarizes discussions and agreed actions in writing |
| 3. Advanced | Explains the reasons behind decisions; handles difficult conversations calmly and directly |
| 4. Strategic | Communicates direction across the organization; creates channels for upward feedback |
A role profile built from the framework
For a single role, you pick the competencies that matter most and set the required level for each. For example, a hypothetical procurement team lead might need:
- Core: "Acts with integrity" at level 2.
- Behavioral: "Planning and organizing" at level 2, "Communicating clearly" at level 2.
- Technical: "Procurement regulations" at level 3.
- Leadership: "Develops others" at level 1.
Keep role profiles to five to eight competencies. More than that becomes hard to assess and hard to remember.
How to build a competency framework in 7 steps
Building a framework is part analysis, part agreement. The steps below reflect common practice and the recommendations in competency modeling research.
- Define the purpose and scope. Decide what the framework is for (hiring, performance, 360 feedback, development, or all of them) and which roles it covers first. A pilot with one job family is easier than the whole organization at once.
- Gather evidence about the work. Review strategy documents, values, job descriptions and existing performance criteria. Interview high performers and their managers, and run short workshops asking "What do the best people in this role do differently?" Campion and colleagues (2011) recommend tying competencies to business objectives and to evidence about the work, not only to opinion.
- Draft a small set of competencies. Group what you heard into themes and name them. Aim for three to five core competencies and a short list per job family. Check the draft against a published taxonomy to spot gaps or overlaps.
- Write definitions and proficiency levels. Give each competency a clear definition and three to five levels. Each level should build on the one before it.
- Write observable behavioral indicators. For each level, write two to four behaviors a manager or colleague could see. Avoid adjectives such as "excellent" or "strong"; describe the action instead.
- Validate with the people who will use it. Test the draft with managers and employees in the roles. Ask whether each indicator is clear, observable and relevant. Remove anything people read differently.
- Launch, connect and review. Publish the framework with simple guidance, build it into hiring, review and development processes, and set a review date. Many organizations review technical competencies yearly and core competencies less often.
Checklist for each competency
Before you finalize a competency, check that it:
- Has a name of two to four words.
- Has a definition that a new employee could understand.
- Describes one capability, not two combined.
- Has levels that build on each other.
- Uses behavioral indicators someone could observe.
- Uses your organization's own language, not consultant jargon.
- Is relevant to the roles that will use it.
Using one framework for hiring, 360 feedback and development
A framework creates value when it connects decisions across the employee lifecycle. Campion and colleagues (2011) note that one advantage of competency models is their ability to align different HR systems around the same definitions.
| Process | How the framework is used | Example evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Hiring | Role profiles define what to assess; interview questions and tests map to competencies | Structured interview ratings, skills tests, work samples |
| Onboarding | New joiners see the behaviors expected in their role | Role profile shared in the first week |
| 360 feedback | Questionnaire items describe behavioral indicators for each competency | Ratings and comments from manager, peers and direct reports |
| Performance reviews | Managers discuss how goals were achieved, not only whether | Examples linked to competency levels |
| Development | Gaps between current and required levels become development priorities | Individual development plans |
| Succession and promotion | Readiness for the next role is judged against its required levels | Combined evidence from performance, assessments and feedback |
Hiring
Each role profile tells you which competencies to assess and at what level. Write interview questions that ask for past examples of the behavioral indicators, and use skills tests for technical competencies. On the technical side, TeamCheck's technical assessments can generate competencies from a job description and run competency-based tests.
360 feedback
A 360 questionnaire is a natural place to use behavioral indicators: each item describes one behavior from the framework, and raters say how often they see it. If your indicators are already observable, writing the questionnaire is much faster. The guide to 360 feedback questions shows how to turn competencies into clear items.
If you want to run 360 feedback on your own framework, TeamCheck's 360-Degree Feedback offers ready templates for almost all positions, generates competencies from an uploaded job description, maps your organization's own competencies, and includes a library of 36 competencies. Results come back as an analysis, a management report and an individual feedback report.
Development
When people know the required level for their role, and receive evidence about where they are now, they can choose one or two competencies to work on. A development plan then links each priority to actions such as a stretch assignment, coaching or a course, and to the evidence that will show progress.
Common mistakes when building a competency framework
- Too many competencies. Frameworks with dozens of competencies per role are hard to assess and quickly ignored. Keep role profiles short.
- Vague definitions. "Leadership" or "professionalism" without behavioral indicators means each manager reads them differently.
- Copying a generic list. A purchased list can help you start, but people trust a framework that uses their own language and reflects their work.
- Describing personality rather than behavior. "Is confident" is a judgment about a person; "presents recommendations to senior stakeholders" is a behavior you can observe.
- Levels that do not build. If level 3 is just level 2 with "very" added, it does not help anyone see what growth looks like.
- Building it and not using it. A framework that is not connected to hiring, reviews or development becomes a document on a shared drive.
- Never reviewing it. Roles, technology and strategy change. Set a review date at launch.
- Leaving out the people who do the work. Frameworks written only by HR or consultants often miss what actually distinguishes good performance.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a competency and a skill?
A skill is a specific learned ability, such as using a spreadsheet or speaking a language. A competency is broader: it combines knowledge, skills, abilities and behaviors that together lead to effective performance in a role. For example, "data analysis" may be a skill, while "analyzing and interpreting information" is a competency that includes the skill, the judgment to use it and the habit of checking conclusions.
How many competencies should a framework have?
There is no fixed number, but smaller is usually better. Many organizations use three to five core competencies for everyone, and five to eight competencies in each role profile, including technical ones. The whole library can be larger, as long as each role only draws on the competencies that matter most for it.
What is the difference between a competency model and a competency framework?
The terms are often used interchangeably. When people distinguish them, a competency model usually describes the competencies for one role or job family, while a competency framework is the wider structure that holds all the models, definitions and proficiency levels across the organization. What matters more than the label is that definitions are clear and used consistently.
How often should a competency framework be updated?
Review it at least every two to three years, and sooner if your strategy, structure or technology changes significantly. Technical competencies often need a yearly check because tools and standards move faster. Keep core competencies stable where possible, so that results from hiring, 360 feedback and reviews stay comparable over time.
Can we use a competency framework for 360 feedback?
Yes, and it is one of the most practical uses. Each 360 item can describe one behavioral indicator from the framework, rated by manager, peers and direct reports. This keeps feedback focused on observable behavior and links results directly to the levels people are developing toward.
Summary
A competency framework describes, in observable behavior, what good work looks like at your organization and how it changes as responsibility grows. Keep it short, define each competency clearly, build levels that show real progression, and test it with the people who will use it. Its value comes from using the same language in hiring, 360 feedback, reviews and development. To put your own framework to work in structured feedback, explore TeamCheck's 360-Degree Feedback.
References
We cite sources so you can read further. Links open external websites.
- Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling (Campion, Fink, Ruggeberg, Carr, Phillips & Odman). Personnel Psychology, 2011. doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x (opens in a new tab)
- The Great Eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation (Bartram). Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005. doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1185 (opens in a new tab)
- Competencies (Assessment and Selection). U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 2026. www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/assessment-and-selection/competencies/ (opens in a new tab)
Written by
TeamCheck Editorial Team
TeamCheck is an HR talent intelligence platform. Articles are researched and written by the TeamCheck editorial team.